In brief
On 26 August 2026, the Ministry of Law ("MinLaw") and the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) launched a public consultation on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on Singapore's intellectual property (IP) regime.
The consultation will run from 26 August to 22 October 2026.
Interested parties may submit copyright-related feedback here and patent-related feedback here.
The consultation seeks views on whether Singapore's copyright and patent frameworks remain fit for purpose in light of rapid developments in generative AI and AI-assisted innovation. It focuses on a number of key issues, including the use of copyright works for AI training, copyright risks arising from AI-generated outputs, the treatment of AI-assisted works, inventorship in AI-assisted inventions, and the impact of AI-generated disclosures on patentability assessments.
While the consultation does not propose legislative amendments at this stage, it provides an insightful indication of Singapore's current thinking on a number of AI-related copyright and patent issues that have attracted significant international attention.
In more detail
Copyright
The consultation focuses on whether Singapore's copyright framework continues to strike an appropriate balance between supporting AI innovation and protecting the interests of rights owners. In particular, MinLaw and IPOS are seeking feedback on issues arising across the AI lifecycle, including the training, deployment and use of AI systems.
A key area of focus is Singapore's computational data analysis (CDA) exception, which permits certain uses of copyright works for computational analysis and machine learning purposes. The consultation seeks views on the operation of the exception, including the legal and practical safeguards available to rights owners; the concept of lawful access; and the potential role of technical measures and industry standards in supporting responsible AI development.
The consultation also examines copyright risks arising from AI-generated outputs. Specifically, MinLaw and IPOS are seeking views on how established copyright principles should apply where AI-generated content reproduces protected works, and how responsibility should be assessed among AI developers, deployers and users.
In addition, the consultation revisits questions surrounding human creativity and authorship in the context of generative AI.
Patents
The consultation also addresses the increasing role of AI in research and development and its potential impact on patent law.
Among other issues, MinLaw and IPOS seek views on how existing inventorship principles should apply where AI is used to generate, evaluate or refine technical solutions.
The consultation explores a variety of human-AI interactions in the inventive process and seeks feedback on the level of human contribution that should be required for inventorship purposes.
The consultation also considers the implications of AI-generated technical disclosures on the patent system. As generative AI tools become capable of creating and publishing large volumes of technical content, MinLaw and IPOS are seeking feedback on whether existing approaches to novelty, inventive step and prior art remain appropriate.
Technical standards and risk management
The consultation also highlights the growing importance of technical measures and industry standards in managing AI-related IP risks.
It discusses a range of existing and emerging tools that may support responsible AI development, copyright compliance and risk management throughout the AI lifecycle.
Key takeaways
This represents the most comprehensive review to date of the interaction between AI and Singapore's IP regime.
While no legislative changes have been proposed at this stage, the issues identified by MinLaw and IPOS provide a useful indication of the areas most likely to attract future policy and regulatory attention.
Businesses that develop, deploy or use AI systems should closely monitor the consultation, particularly where their activities involve AI training, AI-assisted content generation, AI-assisted research and development, or the commercialisation of AI-enabled products and services.
Technology companies, AI developers, platform operators, publishers, media organisations and rights owners with an interest in the operation of Singapore's CDA exception, AI training practices, licensing models and rights-owner safeguards may wish to take this opportunity to contribute practical industry perspectives on these issues, and shape the direction of Singapore's AI and IP framework.
* * * * *
© 2026 Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "principal" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.