Cameron Reilly

Cameron advises mainly on transfer pricing disputes and other local and international tax disputes. He assists clients in all stages of tax disputes — from audit and administrative appeals before the IRS to litigation before the United States Tax Court and other federal courts.

Cameron also teaches the Transfer Pricing class as an adjunct professor in the Northwestern University School of Law’s LLM in Taxation Program.

• Harman International Industries, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court, No. 3423-24 (section 954 and 956 issues)
• Sysco Corp. v. Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court, No. 5728-23 (section 965 issues, challenge to the validity of regulations under sections 965 and 78, and transfer pricing dispute)
• Amgen Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court, Nos. 16017-21 & 15631-22 (transfer pricing dispute)
• Facebook, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court, No. 21959-16 (transfer pricing cost-sharing valuation dispute)
• Pfizer Inc. & Subs. v. United States, No. 19-01803 T, U.S. Court of Federal Claims (successful resolution of section 6611 overpayment interest suit)
• FedEx Corp. & Subs. v. United States, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, No. 2:20-cv-02794 (challenge to the validity of regulations under section 965)
• Whirlpool Financial Corp. v. Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court, Nos. 13986-17, 13987-17, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Nos. 20-1899, 20-1900 (application of Subpart F Manufacturing Branch Rules to Mexican manufacturing company)
• Judkins v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 20-cv-2342, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (FOIA litigation related to section 965 administrative record)
• Judkins v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 20-cv-2344, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (FOIA litigation related to section 965 administrative record)
• Richardson v. Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court Dkt. No. 7390-17S (section 469(i) rental real estate passive activity loss issue with a stipulated decision that no deficiencies or accuracy-related penalties are applicable)
• Blumenkrantz v Commissioner, U.S. Tax Court, No. 26585-17 (civil fraud and FBAR litigation)
• Bin Attash v. Biden, No. 05-cv-1592, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Guantanamo Bay detainee habeas counsel and Private Counsel before the Periodic Review Board)
• Al-Bihani v. Biden, No. 22-cv-2845 and No. 05-cv-2386, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Guantanamo Bay detainee habeas counsel litigation)

• American Bar Association - Member
• NBLSA Tax Mentor Program - Mentor