The Singapore Court of Appeal recently reversed the ruling of the Singapore High Court in BNA v BNB and another [2019] SGCA 84. It found that Shanghai, not Singapore, was the parties' chosen arbitral seat and thus PRC law was the governing law of the arbitration clause. You can read our report of the High Court's decision in our previous client alert here.

This ruling is an important reminder to all parties to ensure that their arbitration clauses explicitly and unambiguously specify both the arbitral seat and proper law of the arbitration clause.

download pdf button

Explore More Insight